In this article we will complete learn about:
Judicial Administration in Pakistan
Introduction
Brief overview of the judicial system in Pakistan
Historical Background
Historical evolution of judicial administration in Pakistan
Structure of the Judicial System
Role of Judiciary
Challenges Faced
Reforms in the Judicial System
Conclusion
Recap of key points and importance of a strong and independent judiciary in Pakistan.
Frequently Asked Questions and It's Answers
Write details Notes on
☀️ Judicial Administration in Pakistan
I. Introduction
A. Brief overview of judicial system in Pakistan
The judicial system in Pakistan is a complex and multi-layered entity, comprising various courts and tribunals that play a crucial role in dispensing justice and upholding the rule of law. Here is a detailed overview of the judicial system in Pakistan:
Supreme Court of Pakistan
The Supreme Court is the highest court in Pakistan, with the power to interpret the Constitution and laws of the country. It has the final say in all matters, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, which allows it to declare any law or government action unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court is the highest court in Pakistan and has the final say in all matters.
High Courts
There are five High Courts in Pakistan, one for each province (Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan, and Islamabad). High Courts have jurisdiction over their respective provinces and can hear appeals from lower courts. They also have the power to issue writs and orders to protect fundamental rights.High Courts are headed by a Chief Justice and consist of other judges appointed by the President of Pakistan.
District Courts
District Courts are the primary trial courts in Pakistan, with jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases. They are headed by a District Judge and have the power to try cases and pass judgments.
District Courts are the primary trial courts in Pakistan and have jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases.
⭐They are headed by a District Judge and have the power to try cases and pass judgments.
⭐District Courts are divided into several categories, including:
⭐Civil Courts: deal with civil cases such as property disputes, contracts, and family law.
⭐ Criminal Courts: deal with criminal cases such as murder, theft, and fraud.
⭐ Family Courts: deal with family law cases such as divorce, child custody, and inheritance.
⭐Labor Courts: deal with labor disputes and employment cases.
Sessions Courts
Sessions Courts are responsible for trying criminal cases, and are headed by a Sessions Judge. They have the power to award sentences, including life imprisonment and death.
Sessions Courts are responsible for trying criminal cases and are headed by a Sessions Judge.
⭐They have the power to award sentences, including life imprisonment and death.
⭐Sessions Courts are divided into several categories, including:
⭐Sessions Courts: deal with serious criminal cases such as murder, treason, and terrorism.
⭐Special Courts: deal with specific cases such as drug trafficking, corruption, and terrorism.
Magistrate Courts
Magistrate Courts are the lowest tier of the judicial system, with jurisdiction over minor criminal cases and civil cases. They are headed by a Magistrate and have limited powers.
Magistrate Courts are the lowest tier of the judicial system and have limited powers.
⭐They are headed by a Magistrate and deal with minor criminal cases and civil cases.
⭐ Magistrate Courts are divided into several categories, including:
⭐Judicial Magistrates: deal with criminal cases such as theft, fraud, and assault.
⭐Executive Magistrates: deal with administrative cases such as revenue, land, and local government matters.
Tribunals
Pakistan has various tribunals, including administrative tribunals, labor tribunals, and tax tribunals, which have specialized jurisdiction over specific matters.
Pakistan has various tribunals, including:
⭐Administrative Tribunals: deal with administrative cases such as service matters, pension, and promotion.
⭐Labor Tribunals: deal with labor disputes and employment cases.
⭐Tax Tribunals: deal with tax cases and revenue matters.
⭐Appellate Tribunals: deal with appeals from lower courts and tribunals.
Judicial Hierarchy
The judicial hierarchy in Pakistan is as follows:
⭐ Supreme Court of Pakistan
⭐ High Courts
⭐ District Courts
⭐ Sessions Courts
⭐ Magistrate Courts
⭐ Tribunals
Challenges and Reforms
Pakistan's judicial system faces several challenges, including:
⭐ Backlog of cases
⭐ Corruption
⭐ Political interference
⭐ Limited access to justice
To address these challenges, various reforms have been introduced, including:
⭐ Judicial reforms
⭐ Legal aid programs
⭐ Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
⭐ Technology integration
Pakistan's judicial system is a complex and multi-layered entity, with various courts and tribunals playing a crucial role in dispensing justice and upholding the rule of law. While the system faces several challenges, ongoing reforms aim to address these issues and improve access to justice for all citizens.
II. Historical background of judicial administration in Pakistan
The judicial administration in Pakistan has a rich and complex history that spans over several centuries. The country's legal system has been shaped by various factors, including the colonial legacy, Islamic law, and political developments.
Pre-British Era (711-1849 AD)
During the pre-British era, Pakistan was ruled by various Muslim dynasties, including the Umayyads, Abbasids, and Mughals. Islamic law (Sharia) was the primary source of law, and the judicial system was based on the principles of justice, equity, and fairness. The Qazis (judges) were responsible for administering justice, and their decisions were guided by the Quran, Hadith, and Islamic jurisprudence.
British Colonial Era (1849-1947 AD)
The British colonial era had a significant impact on the judicial administration in Pakistan. The British introduced their own legal system, which was based on common law and equity. The Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Code of Civil Procedure were enacted, and the judiciary was reorganized to conform to the British model. The High Courts were established in the provinces, and the Privy Council in London was the highest court of appeal.
Post-Independence Era (1947-1956 AD)
After Pakistan gained independence in 1947, the country's judicial system was reorganized. The Federal Court of Pakistan was established, and the Supreme Court of Pakistan was created in 1956. The Constitution of Pakistan, 1956, provided for an independent judiciary, and the Supreme Court was given the power to interpret the Constitution and laws of Pakistan.
Ayub Khan Era (1958-1969 AD)
During the Ayub Khan era, the judicial system was reformed, and the Supreme Court was given more powers. The Constitution of Pakistan, 1962, provided for a more robust judiciary, and the Supreme Court was given the power to review its own decisions.
Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Era (1971-1977 AD)
The Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto era saw significant changes in the judicial system. The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, provided for an independent judiciary, and the Supreme Court was given more powers. The High Courts were also given more autonomy, and the judicial system was reorganized to conform to the principles of socialism and democracy.
Zia-ul-Haq Era (1977-1988 AD)
During the Zia-ul-Haq era, the judicial system was reformed, and the Supreme Court was given more powers. The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, was amended, and the Supreme Court was given the power to review its own decisions. The High Courts were also given more autonomy, and the judicial system was reorganized to conform to the principles of Islamization.
Nawaz Sharif Era (1990-1993 AD)
The Nawaz Sharif era saw significant changes in the judicial system. The Supreme Court was given more powers, and the High Courts were given more autonomy. The judicial system was reorganized to conform to the principles of democracy and human rights.
Musharraf Era (1999-2008 AD)
During the Musharraf era, the judicial system was reformed, and the Supreme Court was given more powers. The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, was amended, and the Supreme Court was given the power to review its own decisions. The High Courts were also given more autonomy, and the judicial system was reorganized to conform to the principles of democracy and human rights.
The judicial administration in Pakistan has a rich and complex history that spans over several centuries. The country's legal system has been shaped by various factors, including the colonial legacy, Islamic law, and political developments. The Supreme Court of Pakistan has played a crucial role in upholding the Constitution and laws of Pakistan, and has given several landmark decisions on issues such as human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. Despite several challenges, the judicial system in Pakistan continues to evolve and adapt to the changing needs of the country.
III. Structure of the judicial system in Pakistan
A. Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of Pakistan holds the highest authority in the nation, serving as the ultimate interpreter of the law and the Constitution. It has the power to interpret the Constitution and laws of Pakistan, and its decisions are binding on all other courts in the country. The Supreme Court has the power to issue writs and orders to protect fundamental rights, and it can also review its own decisions. The Supreme Court is headed by the Chief Justice of Pakistan and consists of other judges appointed by the President of Pakistan.
The Supreme Court has the following powers and functions:
☀️Original jurisdiction: The Supreme Court has the power to hear cases that involve the interpretation of the Constitution or federal laws.
☀️Appellate jurisdiction: The Supreme Court can hear appeals from the High Courts and other courts in Pakistan.
☀️Review jurisdiction: The Supreme Court can review its own decisions.
☀️ Advisory jurisdiction: The Supreme Court can give advice to the President of Pakistan on legal matters.
B. High Courts
The High Courts in Pakistan are the highest courts in each province and have the power to hear appeals from the District Courts. They also have the power to issue writs and orders to protect fundamental rights. The High Courts are headed by a Chief Justice and consist of other judges appointed by the President of Pakistan.
The High Courts have the following powers and functions:
☀️ Appellate jurisdiction: The High Courts can hear appeals from the District Courts.
☀️ Original jurisdiction: The High Courts have the power to hear cases that involve the interpretation of provincial laws.
☀️ Review jurisdiction: The High Courts can review their own decisions.
☀️ Advisory jurisdiction: The High Courts can give advice to the provincial governments on legal matters.
C. District Courts
The District Courts in Pakistan are the primary trial courts and have the power to hear criminal and civil cases. They are headed by a District Judge and consist of other judges appointed by the High Court.
The District Courts have the following powers and functions:
☀️ Original jurisdiction: The District Courts have the power to hear criminal and civil cases.
☀️ Appellate jurisdiction: The District Courts can hear appeals from the lower courts.
☀️ Execution jurisdiction: The District Courts can execute the decisions of the higher courts.
In addition to these courts, there are also specialized courts in Pakistan, such as the Federal Shariat Court, the Labor Courts, and the Family Courts, which have the power to hear specific types of cases.
IV. Role of judiciary in Pakistan
The judiciary in Pakistan plays a vital role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring that the country's legal system functions effectively. The key roles of the judiciary in Pakistan include:
A. Interpretation of Laws:
🔹The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the laws of Pakistan, including the Constitution.
🔹The Supreme Court and High Courts have the power to interpret laws and determine their applicability in various cases.
🔹Judicial interpretations of laws help to clarify ambiguities and provide guidance to lower courts, legal professionals, and the general public.
B. Protection of Fundamental Rights:
🔹The judiciary is responsible for protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, as enshrined in the Constitution.
🔹The Supreme Court and High Courts have the power to issue writs and orders to protect fundamental rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property.
🔹The judiciary ensures that the government and other institutions do not infringe on citizens' fundamental rights.
C. Ensuring Justice and Fairness:
🔹The judiciary is responsible for ensuring that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.
🔹Courts at all levels, from the Supreme Court to the lower courts, strive to deliver justice without bias or prejudice.
🔹The judiciary ensures that all citizens have equal access to justice, regardless of their social status, gender, or religious beliefs.
Additional roles of the judiciary in Pakistan include:
🔹Ensuring accountability and transparency in government and public institutions
🔹Providing a check on the executive and legislative branches of government
🔹Resolving disputes and conflicts in a peaceful and legal manner
🔹Upholding the rule of law and maintaining public order
🔹Ensuring that the legal system is accessible and affordable for all citizens
The judiciary plays a vital role in upholding the rule of law, protecting fundamental rights, and ensuring justice and fairness in Pakistan. Its roles are essential to maintaining a stable, democratic, and just society.
V. Challenges faced by judicial administration in Pakistan
The judicial administration in Pakistan faces numerous challenges that hinder its ability to deliver efficient and effective justice. Some of the key challenges include:
A. Backlog of Cases:
🔹The judiciary in Pakistan is grappling with a massive backlog of cases, with millions of cases pending in various courts across the country.
🔹This backlog is attributed to a variety of factors, including a shortage of judges, inadequate infrastructure, and inefficient court procedures.
🔹The backlog results in lengthy delays in the disposal of cases, causing frustration and hardship for litigants.
B. Lack of Resources and Infrastructure:
🔹The judiciary in Pakistan lacks adequate resources and infrastructure, including court buildings, judges, and support staff.
🔹Many courts, particularly in rural areas, lack basic facilities such as electricity, water, and sanitation.
🔹The shortage of judges and support staff results in a heavy workload, leading to delays and inefficiencies.
C. Corruption and Political Interference:
🔹Corruption is a significant challenge facing the judiciary in Pakistan, with instances of bribery, nepotism, and favoritism reported in various courts.
🔹Political interference is another challenge, with the executive and legislative branches often attempting to influence judicial decisions.
🔹This corruption and political interference undermine the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, eroding public trust and confidence.
Additional challenges faced by the judicial administration in Pakistan include:
🔹Inadequate training and development opportunities for judges and support staff
🔹Limited access to justice for marginalized communities, including women, minorities, and the poor
🔹Inefficient court procedures and practices
🔹Lack of technology and digital infrastructure
🔹Political instability and security concerns
To address these challenges, the government and the judiciary must work together to implement reforms and initiatives that strengthen the judicial system. Some potential solutions include:
🔹Increasing the number of judges and support staff
🔹Improving court infrastructure and facilities
🔹Implementing efficient court procedures and practices
🔹Providing training and development opportunities for judges and support staff
🔹Enhancing access to justice for marginalized communities
🔹Utilizing technology and digital infrastructure to improve court efficiency and transparency
🔹Strengthening judicial independence and impartiality
By addressing these challenges and implementing reforms, the judicial administration in Pakistan can improve its ability to deliver efficient and effective justice, enhancing public trust and confidence in the judicial system.
VI. Reforms in the judicial system
The judicial system of Pakistan has undergone significant reforms in recent years to improve its efficiency, effectiveness, and accessibility. Three key reforms have been introduced to achieve these goals: the introduction of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, the strengthening of judicial independence, and the improvement of access to justice for all citizens.
A. Introduction of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
The introduction of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms is a significant reform aimed at reducing the burden on the courts and providing faster and more efficient dispute resolution. ADR mechanisms include mediation, arbitration, conciliation, and negotiation, among others. These mechanisms offer a alternative to traditional litigation, which can be time-consuming, costly, and formal.
The benefits of ADR mechanisms are numerous. They offer a faster and more flexible approach to dispute resolution, allowing parties to reach a settlement without going to court. ADR mechanisms are also less formal and less expensive than traditional litigation, making them more accessible to citizens. Additionally, ADR mechanisms allow parties to maintain control over the dispute resolution process and reach a settlement that is mutually acceptable.
To implement ADR mechanisms, the government has established ADR centers in various districts and cities across Pakistan. These centers provide citizens with access to trained mediators, arbitrators, and conciliators who can facilitate dispute resolution. The government has also introduced training programs for mediators, arbitrators, and conciliators to ensure that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to facilitate effective dispute resolution.
B. Strengthening of Judicial Independence
The strengthening of judicial independence is a critical reform aimed at ensuring that the judiciary is impartial, independent, and effective. Judicial independence is essential for upholding the rule of law and ensuring that citizens have access to justice. In Pakistan, the judiciary has faced challenges in maintaining its independence, with instances of political interference and executive influence.
To strengthen judicial independence, the government has introduced several reforms. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan has been established to oversee the appointment and promotion of judges. This commission is responsible for ensuring that judges are appointed based on merit and that they are not subject to political influence.
The Supreme Court and High Courts have also been empowered to take suo motu notices of human rights violations and other matters of public importance. This power allows the judiciary to take proactive steps in upholding the rule of law and protecting citizens' rights.
Furthermore, the government has introduced a constitutional amendment that prohibits the executive from influencing judicial decisions. This amendment ensures that the judiciary is insulated from political interference and that judges can make decisions based on the law and evidence.
C. Improving Access to Justice for All Citizens
Improving access to justice for all citizens is a critical reform aimed at ensuring that everyone has access to the justice system, regardless of their background or circumstances. In Pakistan, access to justice has been a challenge, particularly for marginalized communities, including women, minorities, and the poor.
To improve access to justice, the government has introduced several reforms. Legal aid services have been expanded to provide free legal assistance to marginalized communities. This assistance includes legal advice, representation, and other support services.
Mobile courts and judicial tribunals have also been established to reach remote and underserved areas. These courts provide citizens with access to justice at their doorstep, reducing the need for them to travel to urban areas to access the justice system.
Court fees have been reduced or waived for certain categories of cases, making justice more accessible to all citizens. The government has also introduced a system of court fees waivers for citizens who cannot afford to pay.
The reforms introduced in Pakistan's judicial system have had a positive impact on the administration of justice. The introduction of ADR mechanisms has reduced the burden on the courts and provided citizens with a faster and more efficient approach to dispute resolution. The strengthening of judicial independence has ensured that the judiciary is impartial and independent, allowing citizens to have confidence in the justice system. Finally, the improvement of access to justice has ensured that marginalized communities have access to the justice system, allowing them to seek redress for their grievances.
VII. Conclusion
A. Recap of key points
The judicial administration in Pakistan is a vital component of the country's legal system, responsible for the administration of justice and the resolution of disputes. The judiciary in Pakistan is an independent branch of the government, with the Supreme Court as its highest court. In this recap, we will discuss the key points of judicial administration in Pakistan, including the structure and organization of the judiciary, the appointment and removal of judges, the jurisdiction and powers of the courts, and the challenges faced by the judicial system.
Structure and Organization of the Judiciary
The judiciary in Pakistan is divided into three tiers: the Supreme Court, the High Courts, and the subordinate courts. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the country, with the power to interpret the Constitution and the law. The High Courts have jurisdiction over the provinces, while the subordinate courts have jurisdiction over the districts and lower levels.
The Supreme Court is composed of a Chief Justice and other judges, appointed by the President of Pakistan. The High Courts are also headed by a Chief Justice and other judges, appointed by the President. The subordinate courts are headed by a District Judge and other judges, appointed by the High Court.
Appointment and Removal of Judges
The appointment of judges in Pakistan is a controversial issue, with political interference and nepotism being common criticisms. The Constitution provides for the appointment of judges by the President, in consultation with the Chief Justice and other judges. However, in practice, political considerations often play a significant role in the appointment process.
The removal of judges is also a contentious issue, with the Constitution providing for the removal of judges by the President, on the recommendation of the Supreme Judicial Council. However, this process has been criticized for being slow and ineffective, with many judges remaining in office despite allegations of misconduct.
Jurisdiction and Powers of the Courts
The courts in Pakistan have the power to interpret the Constitution and the law, and to decide disputes between citizens and the state. The Supreme Court has the power to hear appeals from the High Courts and the subordinate courts, and to issue writs and orders to protect fundamental rights.
The High Courts have the power to hear appeals from the subordinate courts, and to issue writs and orders to protect fundamental rights. The subordinate courts have the power to hear criminal and civil cases, and to issue judgments and orders.
Challenges Faced by the Judicial System
The judicial system in Pakistan faces several challenges, including political interference, corruption, and a backlog of cases. Political interference is a significant problem, with political considerations often influencing the appointment and removal of judges.
Corruption is also a major issue, with many judges and court officials being accused of accepting bribes and other forms of corruption. The backlog of cases is another significant challenge, with many cases taking years to be resolved.
The judicial administration in Pakistan is a complex and controversial issue, with several challenges facing the system. The structure and organization of the judiciary, the appointment and removal of judges, and the jurisdiction and powers of the courts are all key aspects of the judicial system. However, political interference, corruption, and a backlog of cases are significant challenges that need to be addressed to ensure the effective administration of justice in Pakistan.
Recommendations
To address the challenges facing the judicial system in Pakistan, several recommendations can be made:
🔹The appointment of judges should be made on the basis of merit and qualifications, rather than political considerations.
🔹The removal of judges should be made easier and more effective, with a clear and transparent process.
🔹The courts should be provided with more resources and funding to address the backlog of cases.
🔹Measures should be taken to reduce corruption in the judiciary, including the establishment of an independent judicial complaints commission.
🔹The judiciary should be made more accountable to the public, with regular reports and evaluations of its performance.
By implementing these recommendations, the judicial system in Pakistan can be made more effective and efficient, and the administration of justice can be improved.
B. Importance of a strong and independent judiciary in Pakistan
A strong and independent judiciary is essential for the functioning of a democratic society like Pakistan. The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law, protecting citizens' rights, and ensuring that the government and other institutions do not abuse their power. In Pakistan, a strong and independent judiciary is particularly important due to the country's history of military rule, political instability, and corruption.
Here are some reasons why a strong and independent judiciary is important in Pakistan:
1. Protection of Citizens' Rights: The judiciary is responsible for protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, including the right to life, liberty, and property. An independent judiciary ensures that these rights are not violated by the government or other powerful institutions.
2. Upholding the Rule of Law: The judiciary is responsible for upholding the rule of law in Pakistan. This means that the judiciary ensures that all citizens, including the government and other institutions, are subject to the law and that no one is above the law.
3. Checking the Power of the Government: A strong and independent judiciary acts as a check on the power of the government. This ensures that the government does not abuse its power and that citizens are protected from government overreach.
4. Ensuring Accountability: The judiciary ensures that those in power are held accountable for their actions. This includes ensuring that government officials, politicians, and other powerful individuals are held accountable for any wrongdoing.
5. Promoting Democracy: A strong and independent judiciary is essential for the functioning of a democratic society. The judiciary ensures that democratic institutions are protected and that the will of the people is respected.
6. Encouraging Economic Growth: A strong and independent judiciary is also essential for economic growth. Investors and businesses need to have confidence in the legal system to invest and operate in Pakistan.
7. Reducing Corruption: Corruption is a major problem in Pakistan, and a strong and independent judiciary is essential for reducing corruption. The judiciary can ensure that those who engage in corrupt practices are held accountable.
8. Protecting the Constitution: The judiciary is responsible for protecting the Constitution of Pakistan. This includes ensuring that any changes to the Constitution are made in accordance with the law and that the Constitution is not violated by the government or other institutions.
9. Ensuring Justice: A strong and independent judiciary ensures that justice is served. This includes ensuring that those who have been wronged receive compensation and that those who have committed crimes are punished.
10. Enhancing International Reputation: A strong and independent judiciary enhances Pakistan's international reputation. This is important for attracting foreign investment, promoting trade, and improving relations with other countries.
In conclusion, a strong and independent judiciary is essential for the functioning of a democratic society like Pakistan. The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law, protecting citizens' rights, and ensuring that the government and other institutions do not abuse their power. A strong and independent judiciary is important for promoting democracy, reducing corruption, protecting the Constitution, ensuring justice, and enhancing Pakistan's international reputation.
VIII.Frequently asked Questions and It's Answers about "Judicial Administration in Pakistan"
Question 1: What is the structure of the judiciary in Pakistan?
Answer: The judiciary in Pakistan is divided into three tiers: the Supreme Court, the High Courts, and the subordinate courts. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the country, followed by the High Courts in each province, and then the subordinate courts in each district.
Question 2: What is the role of the Supreme Court in Pakistan?
Answer : The Supreme Court is the highest court in Pakistan and has the final say in all legal matters. It has the power to interpret the Constitution and the law, and its decisions are binding on all other courts in the country.
Question 3: How are judges appointed in Pakistan?
Answer : Judges in Pakistan are appointed by the President, in consultation with the Chief Justice and other judges. The appointment process is often controversial, with political considerations playing a significant role.
Question 4: What is the role of the High Courts in Pakistan?
Answer : The High Courts in Pakistan have the power to hear appeals from the subordinate courts and to issue writs and orders to protect fundamental rights. They also have the power to hear cases related to the interpretation of the Constitution and the law.
Question 5: What is the role of the subordinate courts in Pakistan?
Answer : The subordinate courts in Pakistan have the power to hear criminal and civil cases, and to issue judgments and orders. They are the lowest tier of the judiciary and are responsible for administering justice at the local level.
Question 6: What is the problem of judicial corruption in Pakistan?
Answer : Judicial corruption is a significant problem in Pakistan, with many judges and court officials being accused of accepting bribes and other forms of corruption. This undermines the integrity of the judiciary and erodes public trust in the legal system.
Question 7: How can judicial corruption be addressed in Pakistan?
Answer : Judicial corruption can be addressed through a number of measures, including the establishment of an independent judicial complaints commission, the introduction of a transparent and accountable appointment process, and the implementation of strict disciplinary measures for judges and court officials found guilty of corruption.
Question 8: What is the role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law in Pakistan?
Answer : The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law in Pakistan by ensuring that all citizens, including the government and other institutions, are subject to the law and that no one is above the law.
Question 9: How can the judiciary in Pakistan be made more independent and effective?
Answer : The judiciary in Pakistan can be made more independent and effective through a number of measures, including the introduction of a transparent and accountable appointment process, the establishment of an independent judicial complaints commission, and the provision of more resources and funding to support the judiciary.
Question 10: What is the importance of a strong and independent judiciary in Pakistan?
Answer: A strong and independent judiciary is essential for the functioning of a democratic society like Pakistan. It ensures that the rule of law is upheld, that citizens' rights are protected, and that those in power are held accountable for their actions.
